Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Adams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08524
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Adams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivory, et al. v. Freese & Goss, PLLC
as 3:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
Carlos M. Ivory , Milton Baldridge , Jerell E. Benson and others
Defendant:
Freese & Goss, PLLC , Richard A. Freese, Dennis C. Sweet, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruitt v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00812
Plaintiff:
Keith Brian Cruitt
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Robert Bentley, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS et al v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
as 1:2013cv06380
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ADAMS and ANN ADAMS
Defendant:
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
ABARCA et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2013at00753
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ABARCA , CRISTINA ABARCA, DENISE ABARCA and others
Petitioner:
LISA EDDINGS-ROSS, CHRISTIE HAMILTON, BRANDON HENSON and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company and Amsted Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC
as 2:2013cv06127
Plaintiff:
Georgine Ann Adams , Scott J. Adams , Webster Joseph Adams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Heferidge et al
as 2:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bernard C. Sullivan
Defendant:
Bob Heferidge and Lue Ann Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv15107
Plaintiff:
Anne Adams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-15107
Plaintiff:
Anne Adams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Adams v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Adams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
