Cases 1 - 10 of 20
DeAngelis et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey DeAngelis and Mary Ann Bowen-DeAngelis
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
BARRETT v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
LOUIS BARRETT, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, MEDICAL DIRECTOR ANN BOWENS and DEPUTY WARDEN ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASS v. WHITTINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS and CALVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGHAM, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, ANN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
JULIUS RAWLS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, MEDICAL DIRECTOR ANN BOWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowens v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04520
Plaintiff:
Ann Bowens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitts et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Monica Fitts , M. F. , Amber Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thelen v. Gregory et al
as 3:2015cv01015
Plaintiff:
Patrick Thelen
Defendant:
Lisa Gregory , Douglas A Kruse , K Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
