Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lee v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2026cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Kenneth Kludy and Devan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. USA
as 4:2026cv03225
Petitioner:
Anthony James Horton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anthony v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv04529
Plaintiff:
Derek Anthony
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wynn v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wynn
Defendant:
Jay Davis and Jay Davis Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026at02935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Gremore v. Hiett et al
as 7:2026cv00602
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Gremore
Defendant:
Brian Hiett, Major Randy Mullins, Captain David Dunford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAVIER FUENTES v. CHEN & ZHENG INC. et al
as 1:2026cv02629
Plaintiff:
NELSON JAVIER FUENTES
Defendant:
CHEN & ZHENG INC. doing business as SATAY CLUB RESTAURANT, ANTHONY GOO and PUI CHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simpson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv03238
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Simpson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Antoine Kassis
as 26-4378
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTOINE KASSIS, a/k/a Toni, a/k/a Tony, a/k/a Anthony Cassis, a/k/a wadad
CLIFF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2026cv02620
Plaintiff:
STACY CLIFF, CHRISTOPHER SUTER, DIXIE SUTER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
