Cases 21 - 30 of 538
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
Ihenachor v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Evans Ihenachor
Defendant:
Wes Moore, Anthony G. Brown and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6148
Petitioner:
RONALD COX
Respondent:
WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and ATTORNEY GENERAL ANTHONY G. BROWN
Andrews v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dessie Andrews
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Current and Former Members of Congress, Robert B Aderholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6044
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEN GANG, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and others
Collins III v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Collins III
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Steven Dettelback, Anthony G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50412
Petitioner:
Anthony G. Bell
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HAPPEL v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY G. HAPPEL
Defendant:
WARDEN MARK BISHOP, DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL SCANNELL, NURSE ANGIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry Hill Dental, Inc. et al v. Bentley Motors, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04159
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hill Dental, Inc. and Anthony G Gadbois
Defendant:
Bentley Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Anthony Bryant v. State Farm Insurance Companies
as 22-2058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY G. BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
