Cases 31 - 40 of 78
McCollough v. Hale
as 19-296
Defendant:
Detective Louis Scarcella, Correctional Officer R. Allen, E. Williams and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael McCollough
Griffin v. Hollis et al
as 3:2018cv03109
Defendant:
Sara Hollis and Jailer Tony Beck
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Hollis et al
as 4:2018cv00780
Defendant:
Sara Hollis and Tony Beck
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stonemark Properties v. Griffin
as 1:2018cv04648
Plaintiff:
Stonemark Properties
Defendant:
Anthony Griffin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Griffin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00928
Plaintiff:
Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Griffin, et al v. Amerada Petroleum Corporation, et al
as 17-30165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY GRIFFIN, on behalf of Morel Griffin and DOROTHY JOACHAIN, on behalf of Morel Griffin
Defendant - Appellee:
HESS CORPORATION, also known as Amerada Petroleum Corporation and EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, trading as Humble Oil, trading as Esso Standard Oil
Griffin v. Haynes
as 3:2016cv03258
Plaintiff:
Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, William Taylor, Brenda Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03226
Plaintiff:
Steve Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BARD DENALI CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
