Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SPARKS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01559
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ANTHONY SPARKS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anthony Sparks v. Target Corporation
as 2:2020cv11662
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Target Corporation and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sparks v. Textron Inc
as 2:2019cv01269
Defendant:
Textron, Inc. and Textron Inc
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sparks v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21044
Plaintiff:
Mary Sparks and Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks v. Gordy, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and Daniel Rieben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 4:2012cv00062
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2011cv00010
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Lee Posey Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2011mc00007
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
