Cases 1 - 10 of 28,424
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Moss v. City of Hattiesburg
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Antonio Moss
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Whiting et al v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv03523
Plaintiff:
Antonio Whiting, Jeffery Hendrix and Sherrie Hendrix
Defendant:
Officer Anthony Santos, Officer Jeffery Marra and Village of Round Lake Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sahabi Convenience Store, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv11160
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sahabi Convenience Store, Inc., Opyum Lounge, LLC Doing business as Opyum Lounge, Hossein Sahabi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Antonio Lamont Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McKinley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03465
Plaintiff:
Antonio McKinley
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Francisco Morado and Antonio Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
