Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Walker et al v. Abbott Laboratories Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Antonio Walker and Jacqueline Daniels
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WALKER et al v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 5:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WALKER and ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ANDREA PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. Switchgrass Holdings, LLC. et al
as 4:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tanyell Thompson, Shimika Landrum, Dejuan Samuel and others
Defendant:
Switchgrass Holdings, LLC. and Switchgrass-IV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Jervonta Walker
as 22-4520
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERVONTA ANTONIO WALKER, a/k/a Stunna, a/k/a Bruce Hudson
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09807
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker-Bey v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01801
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Antonio Walker-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker v. USA
as 7:2018cv08005
Petitioner:
Jaboris Antonio Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WALKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAMS, MICHAEL WILLIAMS, TALETHIA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv00572
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WALKER
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
