Cases 1 - 10 of 126,472
T. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03377
Plaintiff:
T. T.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pawelkowski v. Lawrence Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Leszek Pawelkowski
Defendant:
Lawrence Correctional Center, T Fitzgerald, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant:
Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gillen v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Bart Gillen
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gagne et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gagne and Suzette Gagne
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Kevin Cost, Lee Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
