Cases 31 - 40 of 216
Slocum v. Averitt Express, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02789
Plaintiff:
Ted Slocum
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McPherson v. Averitt Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Plaintiff:
Donald W. McPherson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Christopher G. Boyd and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
SAIA Motor Freight Line LLC v. Averitt Express Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Harold Bibbs & Sons Trucking Inc, Tommy Eugene Cobb, William Charles Beers, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
SAIA Motor Freight Line LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. David Michael Allen et al
as 2:2020cv01175
Defendant:
David Michael Allen, GEICO Insurance Company, BB&T Legge Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Atwine Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans, et al v. Averitt Express Inc, et al
as 2:2020cv00786
Plaintiff:
Roshanda Anderson and Theon Evans
Defendant:
Jeffery Sneed and Averitt Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solomon v. Averitt Express, Inc.
as 7:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jimie Solomon
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowie v. Averitt Express, Inc et al
as 4:2019cv04634
Defendant:
Kristopher Dies and Averitt Express, Inc
Plaintiff:
Terrance Bowie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROUTIN v. AVERITT EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04429
Defendant:
RHETT BUCHMAN and AVERITT EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROUTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith v. Hall et al
as 7:2019cv00597
Plaintiff:
Samantha Keith
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc. and Jamerian Dijon Moon Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERNANDEZ v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv16343
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), MARK RICHARDSON BUTLER, ABC CORP 1-20(fictitious) and others
Plaintiff:
VANESSA FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
