Cases 1 - 10 of 1,159
Boyce v. B. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
B. Smith, T. Mitchell and A. Wasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAETE ET AL v. ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
as 2:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
MARIA P. GAETE, MICHELLE B. SMITH and TANIA L. SMITH
Defendant:
ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. City of Hapeville et al
as 1:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Freda B. Smith and Freda Smith
Defendant:
City of Hapeville and Richard Glavosek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggs v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Mr. B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
