Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Andrews et al v. Foote et al
as 1:2017cv00286
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS B. ANDREWS and THERESA CONNELLY
Defendant:
NATHANIEL FOOTE and YVONNE FOOTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as ID/3:16-cv-00436
Plaintiff:
Richard B Andrews and Robin A Andrews
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Janssen Research & Development, LLC and others
Andrews et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00436
Plaintiff:
Richard B Andrews and Robin A Andrews
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Speidell et al
as 1:2016cv01335
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Jones
Defendant:
R. Speidell, M. D. Biter, P. Vera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Harold G Allen, Jr
Defendant:
Damon B Andrews and Amy A Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Mierczak et al
as 3:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Kaz Mierczak, Monte A Griffin, Jimmy D Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS et al v. FULLINGTON TRAILWAYS, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
THOMAS B. ANDREWS and WENDY ANDREWS
Defendant:
FULLINGTON TRAILWAYS, LLC , FULLINGTON TOURS , LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heap et al v. Hagel et al
as 1:2014cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jason Daniel Heap and The Humanist Society
Defendant:
Charles T. Hagel , Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. , William F. Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fann v. Barber et al
as 1:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Fann
Defendant:
Pamela Barber and B. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Sallie Mae, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02262
Plaintiff:
Nicholas B. Andrews
Defendant:
Sallie Mae, Inc. and Does 1 Through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
