Cases 1 - 10 of 228
Sullivan v. MKS Plastics, L.L.C.
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tyler B Sullivan
Defendant:
MKS Plastics, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Troup v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TROUP
Defendant:
Nora B. Sullivan, James Mish, Michael Koganov and others
Sullivan v. Graham, et al
as 23-3153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN M. GRAHAM, JR., MELINDA YOUNG, DAVID CLYMER and others
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., CAROL MORRIS, LADUSKA ANNE HANEY and others
Sullivan v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority, et al
as 23-3020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL AUTHORITY and MICHELLE SAFFORD
Sullivan v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02491
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Carol Morris, Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sullivan v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority et al
as 2:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
University of Kansas Hospital Authority and Michelle Safford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sullivan v. WorkMarket, et al
as 22-3193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WORKMARKET and PETER CANNONE
Sullivan v. Graham et al
as 2:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
John M. Graham, Jr., Melinda Young, David Clymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
