Cases 81 - 90 of 3,604
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephanie Lalonde, Michael Allen, Mitchell Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al
as 1:2020cv01176
Defendant:
Dell Medical Center at UT System, Washington Mutual Bank, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Saturn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Haynes v. Obama
as 2:2021cv01462
Plaintiff:
James M Haynes
Defendant:
President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 21-56329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, BARACK OBAMA and others
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyama v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv03037
Plaintiff:
Yunan Idris Nyama
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Biden Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 2:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
La Shaun Mauquis Young, Loretta Young and Neisha Walker
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Louis Farrakhan, George W. Bush, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Lewis et al
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Otis Eugene Lewis, Donald Trump, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
