Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Quizel Welsh v. United States, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh, "I Am That I Am"
Defendant:
United States of America, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties, Kathleen Caldarrera, Partner and others
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Craft-Rendon v. City of Houston, Texas
as 4:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Craft-Rendon
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cook v. Davis
as 2:2018cv03592
Defendant:
Sydney Davis
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Cook, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin v. McGowen et al
as 1:2017cv01593
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin, III
Defendant:
Chad McGowen and Robert Fleagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. FRANKLIN
as 1:2017cv01609
Plaintiff:
SHEWANDA R.M. PRICE
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Craft-Rendon et al v. TransCanada Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00374
Respondent:
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP , Wood County Texas and Wood County Sherriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Benjamin-Franklin Sequoyah Craft-Rendon and Shannon Kathleen Bebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craft-Rendon et al v. TransCanada Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv02675
Defendant:
TransCanada Corporation, Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP, Wood County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin-Franklin Sequoyah Craft-Rendon and Shannon Kathleen Bebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
