Cases 61 - 70 of 574
Best
as 5:2022cv00097
Petitioner:
Michele Best
Respondent:
McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Best v. SFF Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Michele Best
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Best v. Ezzell et al
as 5:2022ct03122
Plaintiff:
Tellys Best
Defendant:
Sgt. Ezzell, Lt. Roberts and Sgt. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Sehl et al
as 1:2022cv02766
Plaintiff:
Antoine Eddie Flowers
Defendant:
Detective Donald Sehl, Detective Fred Dorch, Detective Albert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Best v. Headley et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
Terry D Best and Terry Darray Best
Respondent:
Warden III Joseph H. Headley, Steve Marshall and Joseph H Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nieves v. Best
as 22-410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Nieves
Defendant / Appellee:
Miriam R. Best, Acting Supreme Court Justice, Christopher Rivet, Assistant District Attorney, Brandon Riddle, Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reichling v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent:
T.J. Fikes, Dr. Lavalley Wood, Dr. Warlick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornell v. City of Douglasville et al
as 1:2021cv05110
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Cornell
Defendant:
City of Douglasville, Douglas County Public Defender's, Douglasville City Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
