Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bloom et al v. Systics, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04178
Plaintiff:
Sophie Bloom and Benjamin Bloom
Defendant:
Systics, Inc., Amber Lowry, Ryan Massie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Shymansky v. State of New York
as 26-2478
Plaintiff:
DEMIA SHYMANSKY and Wyneika Wilburn
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Green v. State of New York et al
as 1:2026cv07505
Plaintiff:
Melvin Green
Defendant:
State of New York, Darcel Clark, Devin B. Horzempa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pr Fed. Question: Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Andino v. Bloom Insurance Agency, LLC
as 8:2026cv02510
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Andino
Defendant:
Bloom Insurance Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Yaacov Apelbaum v. Jordan Bloom
as 26-2167
Plaintiff:
YAACOV APELBAUM and XRVISION, LTD.
Defendant:
JORDAN ARTHUR BLOOM
Sayareh v. Bloom Nu LLC
as 2:2026cv02895
Plaintiff:
Samin Sayareh
Defendant:
Bloom Nu LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pace v. Lane et al
as 3:2026cv02222
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
Warden C. Lane, A. John, Captain Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
as 4:2026cv00826
Defendant:
AUS Merchant Services Inc, Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Pte Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
