Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Bodley v. Clark
as 12-3725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackie Bodley
Defendant - Appellee:
William Edmund Clark, CEO President et al, TD Bank aka Commerce Bank or unknown CEO President of Commerce Bank when monies were released illegally and TD Bank, Manager TD Bank, Commerce Bank, Name Unknown, Harlem Branch 300 W. 125 St, NY, NY 10027, AKA Commerce Bank
Strauser v. Elsberry, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
Amanda Strauser
Defendant:
Elsberry, Missouri, City of, Rochard Korasick, Robert Bodley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon Bodley v. Andy Ott
as 12-1861
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIMON BODLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDY OTT
Bodley v. Clark et al
as 1:2011cv08955
Plaintiff:
Jackie Bodley
Defendant:
William Edmund Clark , TD Bank and Manager TD Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bodley v. Ott et al
as 1:2011cv08137
Petitioner:
Simon Bodley
Respondent:
Andrew Ott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bodley v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00272
Petitioner:
Keith Wayne Bodley
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Lake County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv03168
Plaintiff:
Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Mitchell R. Howe, K. C. Grisby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Bodley v. Public Storage, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01743
Defendant:
Public Storage, Inc. and Public Storage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Bodley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jonathan Riches v. Hal Bodley
as 08-6612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
HAL BODLEY, d/b/a USA Today Reporter and JANICE LLOYD, d/b/a USA Today Reporter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
