Cases 11 - 20 of 1,970
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bonner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Finger v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Bonner v. Synchron et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Willie Ernest Bonner, Jr.
Defendant:
Synchron, Neuralink and Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
