Cases 1 - 10 of 1,971
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 24-40307
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Botero v. The Grove Hauling et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Laura Botero
Defendant:
The Grove Hauling and Larry Gene Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dawn Keefer, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
DAWN KEEFER and TIMOTHY BONNER
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
BONNER v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05189
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARLA BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonner v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50145
Petitioner:
Lee Bonner
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonner, LLC v. Royce Anderson
as 2:2024cv02842
Plaintiff:
Bonner, LLC
Defendant:
Royce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
