Cases 1 - 10 of 157
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv00491
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Jessica Sage and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Jessica Sage and BoP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOFFMAN v. UNKNOWN BOP, DOJ, DOD EMPLOYEES
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PATRICK HOFFMAN, II
Defendant:
UNKNOWN BOP, DOJ, DOD EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roberts v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv04166
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Defendant:
USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. USA et al
as 6:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
USA, BOP, Lt. Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roberts v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Defendant:
USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Foster v. BOP
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rafael D Foster
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
