Cases 41 - 50 of 11,699
Becnel et al v. Lamorak Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv14536
Defendant:
Eagle Inc., National Automative Parts Association, Turner Industries Group LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross Defendant:
International Paper, Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC, Volkswagon Group of America Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Plaintiff:
james P. becnel, James P Becnel, Sheila Becnel Eschete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kimmons et al v. AutoZone Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kimmons and Gicelia Swopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner, Jr. et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12458
Defendant:
Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Parker-Hannafin Corporation as Successor to EIS Automotive Corporation, Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Turner et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12456
Defendant:
Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Harsco Corporation f/k/a The Patterson-Kelley Co., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Grinnell LLC, Twin Disc, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cross Claimant:
General Dynamics Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Adkins et al v. Danly Machine Division of Connell Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2019cv02143
Defendant:
Toledo Press Company, Inc., SPX Corporation, Clark Industrial Insulation Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Adkins and Harold Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mason et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01362
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ITT, LLC, Grinnell LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mason and Kevin Mason
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1261
Leslie Jack, et al v. DCo, LLC, et al
as 19-35563
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Borg-Warner Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JACK, individually and LESLIE JACK, individually and as Personal Representative of Patrick Jack
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, DCO. LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC and DCO, LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC
BRADLEY et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv02513
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, LLC, AURORA PUMP, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER CO., INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BRADLEY and KENNETH E. BRADLEY
Cross Claimant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and A.W. CHESTERTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Connie Dietrich v. Autozone West, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04291
Defendant:
Autozone West, Inc., The Boeing Company, Borgwarner Morse TEC LLC as Successor-By-Merger to Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dietrich Connie and Connie Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
