Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton, Carolyn Banks, Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04274
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton , Carolyn Banks , Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
William M Staroba et al v. Rick Jackson et al
as 5:2015cv02353
Defendant:
Does, Blake Jackson, Brenda Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory W Schibler, Susan E Schibler, Carolyn J Staroba and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jackson v. Jailers of the Humboldt County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv00220
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Western Nevada Agency and Jailers of the Humboldt County Jail
Petitioner:
Brenda Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01437
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jackson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy White
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education , Doug Butler , Karen Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00919
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jackson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv04983
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jackson
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
