Cases 11 - 20 of 3,832
Crafton v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crafton
Defendant:
Wendy Davis, Bailey Goodwin, Timothy Stucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Bryan Bailey, Christan Dedman, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
