Cases 21 - 30 of 13,946
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Brown (Agoro)
as 24-984
Defendant:
OLUWAGBENGA AGORO, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Bryan Bailey, Christan Dedman, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Oregon State Treasurer
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Charles Bailey
Defendant:
Oregon State Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dampeer v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02957
Plaintiff:
Monique Dampeer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Erleen Banks, Daniel Johnson and others
In re: Chantal Attias, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
In re: Chantal Attias, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Richard Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Latanya Bailey, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
