Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Balch v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00294
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Fayrond Balch
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Balch-Muller v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv24778
Plaintiff:
Michelle Balch-Muller
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Woodham
as 23-1892
Petitioner:
GRACE WOODHAM
Respondent:
GRAFTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM ELLIOTT, GCDC Superintendent, KENDALL, GCDC Captain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Balch v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC
as 7:2023cv01855
Plaintiff:
Tamera D Balch
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Balch
as 5:2022cv08906
Defendant:
David W Balch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balch v. Stoneleigh P et al
as 3:2022cv02197
Plaintiff:
Melanie Balch
Defendant:
Stoneleigh P doing business as Drink Inc and Richard T Garrison
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Anthony v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2022cv06372
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Anthony
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Farhad Abtahian, MD, Jeremiah Depta, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
