Cases 81 - 90 of 220
Hatfield v. Obama et al
as 3:2014cv05324
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shawn Hatfield, Jr
Defendant:
Barack H Obama and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Maisano v. Obama et al
as 3:2014mc00667
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, John Modrzejewski, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Johnson v. Obama et al
as 4:2014cv00504
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Jeremiah W. "Jay" Nixon and Pleading DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Carl E Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert J Moossey, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nixon v. Obama
as 4:2014cv00413
Plaintiff:
Mark A Nixon
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00408
Plaintiff:
Ian J Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert J Moossey, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Samuel v. Bloomberg
as 13-4613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexander Samuel, AKA George Washington Lord Protector of the United States of America, AKA Jesus Christ Highest Lord of Orthodox Church
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City, KGB-FSB-SVR spy of Russia, Bellevue Hospital Center, HHC New York City, AIPAC, Zionis subversive group and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TOBIAS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv06471
Plaintiff:
EDWARD N. TOBIAS and SUZANNE M. KOEGLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK H. OBAMA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
