Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Beeler v. Singh et al
as 3:2026cv00731
Plaintiff: Carolyn Beeler
Defendant: Sukhwant Singh, Boom Transport and Cherokee Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gresham v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2026cv13079
Plaintiff: Michael Ishmael Gresham
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi E. Washington, Adam Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Christien Martin v. MDOC, et al
as 26-1751
Plaintiff: CHRISTIEN DEMARLO CONRADE MARTIN
Defendant: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, official and personal capacities, DALE BONN, Warden, official and personal capacities and others
Marshall v. Thornton et al
as 4:2026cv00516
Plaintiff: Ratacca Lamonze Marshall
Defendant: JoJo Thornton, Kelly Thornton, Garrett Beeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beeler v. Southern Management & Development, L.P. et al
as 3:2026cv00362
Plaintiff: Angel Beeler
Defendant: Southern Management & Development, L.P. and Clay Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
BEELER v. WILSON
as 1:2026cv01445
Petitioner: RUSTY ALLEN BEELER
Respondent: NICOLE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rusty Beeler v. Nicole Wilson
as 26-2393
Petitioner: RUSTY A. BEELER
Respondent: NICOLE WILSON
GALLEGOS et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2026cv01974
Plaintiff: ANGELICA GALLEGOS, BRAD WARNER, HUNTER COOKE and others
Defendant: ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5344
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?