Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rose et al v. Niccole et al
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rose and Jack G. Rose
Defendant:
M.D. Michael Niccole, Mentor Worldwide, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pi
Moore v. Rose et al
as 7:2019cv00552
Plaintiff:
Billy Alexander Moore
Defendant:
Beverly Rose, Counselor Comer and Southwest Virginia Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Severson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv12807
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rose Severson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens et al v. Anthony et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Owens and Beverly Rose Owens
Defendant:
William A. Anthony , Fleet Global Services, Inc. , G.P. Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01293
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rose
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC and Pfizer Inc
Rose v. Wyeth LLC et alDO NOT DOCKET, CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv01629
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rose
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC and Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ratliff v. Baker et al
as 7:2008cv00435
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Ratliff
Defendant:
Doug Baker and Beverly Rose
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mullins v. Baker et al
as 7:2008cv00433
Plaintiff:
Trinity Lynn Mullins
Defendant:
Doug Baker, Beverly Rose and Unknown Defendants within the Administration
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oquinn v. Baker et al
as 7:2008cv00426
Plaintiff:
David Paul Oquinn
Defendant:
Doug Baker and Beverly Rose
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
