Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Brazile v. Washington County Sherriff Office et al
as 3:2026cv01351
Plaintiff:
MarQuise Brazile
Defendant:
Washington County Sherriff Office, Cpl Smith, Sgt Hennessey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barone, et al. v. Marquis, et al.
as 26-4185
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARONE, JR. and NICHOLAS A. SARNELLI
Defendant:
LINDA MARQUIS, MICHAEL KOSTRINSKY, SONJA JONES and others
Perry v. dbbmckennon et al
as 3:2026cv00859
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Perry
Defendant:
dbbmckennon, Michael McKennon and Russell Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jeremiah Baldwin v. Jeffery Aldridge, et al
as 26-3567
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH P. BALDWIN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR JEFFERY ALDRIDGE, DEPUTY LINDA BOYER and REGISTRAR CHARLES L. NORMAN
Benton v. Boyer et al
as 2:2026cv04051
Plaintiff:
Deborah Benton
Defendant:
Josh Boyer, Stephen Borowsky, Arizona Attorney General's Office and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor et al v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2026cv01137
Plaintiff:
Shayzon Taylor and Malik Quick
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Thomas Delmar, Donald Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preciado v. Curtis et al
as 2:2026cv03592
Plaintiff:
Juan-Carlos Preciado and Juan Carlos Preciado
Defendant:
Mikel J Curtis, Noah P Johnson, Allen C Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyer Equipment LLC v. Harbor Dredging LA, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv03992
Plaintiff:
Boyer Equipment LLC
Defendant:
Harbor Dredging LA, Inc., HUB International Gulf South Limited, Michael A. Jones Individual Surety LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
