Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Brakefield et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tanja Laverne Smith
Defendant:
Marcus Brakefield, Jeff Moore, Sarah Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Walden v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Walden, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, David White, Will Brakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABAB Inc et al v. Midwest City City of et al
as 5:2020cv00134
Defendant:
Midwest City City of, Duane Helmberger, Christine Brakefield and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Bahreini and ABAB Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brakefield v. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Scott Brakefield
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brenda Bryant v. City of Cayce
as 10-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CAYCE, M. L. BRAKEFIELD, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce, W. E. ACKERMAN, South Carolina Cayce Police Officer, individually and as agent and employee of the City of Cayce and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
