Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Brandy Calhoun v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-1315
Plaintiff:
BRANDY MICHELLE CALHOUN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Fohmann v. USA
as 1:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Brandy Michelle Fohmann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hale v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brandy Michelle Hale
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Calhoun v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brandy Michelle Calhoun
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Moses et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dewayne Lewis
Defendant:
Sergant Shelia Moses, Micheal Brown, Sergant Patricia Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards et al v. Wiley et al
as 3:2021cv01388
Plaintiff:
Carl Duane Edwards and Brandy Michelle Cherry
Defendant:
Cody Wiley, Michael Haluch, Danny Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2021cv00753
Plaintiff:
Brandy Michelle Page
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
HARRIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
BRANDY MICHELLE HARRIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davison v. Saul
as 4:2021cv02166
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Brandi Michelle Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
