Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Education Amendments of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00753
Plaintiff:
Brian Clayton Charles
Defendant:
United States and Jack Burkhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porche et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Services, LLC
as 3:2017cv01410
Plaintiff:
Brian Clayton and Ashley Porche
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Beauregard et al v. Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
Kent A Snyder, Brian Clayton, Heather L Jessen and others
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Tanita Produce Company Incorporated and Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fjerstad v. United States of America, et. al.
as 3:2014cv01305
Defendant:
Barron Bridgett, J. Calloway, Brian Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fjerstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLAYTON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fjerstad v. Clayton et al
as 3:2013cv01898
Defendant:
Barron Bridgett, J. Calloway, Brian Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fjerstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gordon v. Cathey et al
as 3:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Gordon
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey , Brian Wayne Keziah , Brian Clayton Huncke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Gregory Gordon v. Brian Huncke
as 12-7647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN CLAYTON HUNCKE, BRIAN WAYNE KEZIAH, EDDIE CATHEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
