Cases 21 - 30 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DUNBAR v. ALI et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DUNBAR
Defendant:
ADDUL RAHMAN EL ALI, JACK LAMBERT, CLAY MAGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Britt v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Lowell J. Britt and Lowell J. Britt, IV
Defendant:
John Doe, State of New York, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Shorter v. The Fulton County Medical Examiner Center et al
as 1:2022cv01757
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Shorter
Defendant:
The Fulton County Medical Examiner Center, Bertram Ennett, Unknown Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosales v. Bradshaw, et al
as 22-2027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO ROSALES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BRADSHAW, in his individual and official capacity and SHERIFF BRITT SNYDER, in his individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
