Cases 1 - 10 of 523
SCOTT v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00399
Petitioner:
BRITT SCOTT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Michael Britt, Paige Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Brandon Britt
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Peters et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Linda Gete, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Hammons v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01033
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Whitehead v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whitehead
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sheriff Hans Miller, Lt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jacob Cooper
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Mike Quinn, Boehm Laura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
