Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Jones v. McCoy
as 3:2015cv00406
Plaintiff:
Bruce Stanley Jones
Defendant:
FNU McCoy
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce G. Jones, Jr. v. John Catellucci
as 2:2015mc00227
Defendant:
John Castellucci
Plaintiff:
Bruce G. Jones, Jr.
JONES v. MCCOY
as 1:2015cv00639
Plaintiff:
BRUCE STANLEY JONES
Defendant:
MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05430
Plaintiff:
BRUCE D. JONES
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Wayne A. Jones v. City of Martinsburg
as 14-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF WAYNE A. JONES BY ROBERT L. JONES AND BRUCE A. JONES, Administrators of the Estate of Wayne A. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MARTINSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA, PFC. ERIK HERB, PFC. DANIEL NORTH and others
Defendant:
MARTINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOES 1 THROUGH 25
Jones v. Castellucci
as 14-8060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRUCE G. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CASTELLUCCI
Jones et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27214
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Jones and Bruce A. Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Clint E. Williams , Suzanne Gnehm , Larry E. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Jones v. Castellucci
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bruce G Jones, Jr
Defendant:
John Castellucci
Counter_claimant:
John Castellucci
Counter_defendant:
Bruce G Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Allen et al
as 1:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allen, Jeffrey (I) Allen, Lisa Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
