Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hutchins v. Simmons et al
as 2:2023cv13224
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Hutchins
Defendant:
Brock Simmons, Cody Crites, Bryan Hughes and others
Hughes v. Cartiva, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hughes
Defendant:
Cartiva, Inc., Wright Medical Group, N.V. and Stryker, B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LULAC Texas v. Hughes
as 22-50435
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LULAC Texas, Vote Latino, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and others
Appellant:
Senator Bryan Hughes, Senator Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Texas Representative and others
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17583
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13617
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29518
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Lamar Advertising Company
as 1:2019cv01481
Defendant:
Lamar Advertising Company
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emmanuel Adeyinka v. Harris County Jail, et al
as 18-20525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL ADEYINKA
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, TEXAS GOVENOR GREG ABBOTT, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Adeyinka v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv01782
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Greg Abbott, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
