Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03320
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02701
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut and Ray Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02420
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Ray Chestnut and Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03108
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McVay v. United States et al
as 1:2020cv00064
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and Mid-Atlantic Regional Office
Plaintiff:
Franklin Tuck McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
