Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Burns v. Scott
as 8:2023cv03077
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns
Defendant:
Gabriel Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cobo v. Burns-Cobo et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jayne E Cobo
Defendant:
Lynne Burns-Cobo, Alight Solutions, Minnesota Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Burns v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 6:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Shawn Burns
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Burns v. DXC Technology Company et al
as 2:2020cv00349
Defendant:
DXC Technology Services LLC and DXC Technology Company
Plaintiff:
Pamela Burns
Baxter v. Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03241
Defendant:
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Baxter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Slavin et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
David Slavin , John Bradham , Aaron Bryant and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burns v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv09130
Plaintiff:
Katherine Burns
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation and Michael Hardiman
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gerard Morrison v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 14-2308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD MORRISON, CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, ELTON POLEN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DIZE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VA
BELMONT ET AL v. DIRECTV, INC., ET AL
as 1:2014cv00889
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BELMONT , ANTONIO ACFALLE , WILLIAM BECK and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, INC., DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTSAT USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
