Cases 61 - 70 of 12,149
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Butler v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Constance A. Butler
Defendant:
Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority and Steven Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BUTLER AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
BUTLER AMUSEMENTS, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JULIE A. SU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LEE v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Antonio Leonardo Lee
Defendant:
Gregory W. Edwards and NAKIA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08010
Petitioner:
Brandon Maurice Butler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Butler v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Butler
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Butler v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Butler
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Butler v. Abbott Laboratories
as 1:2024cv02691
Plaintiff:
Kailan Butler
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUN v. BUTLER
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
ROY YOUN
Defendant:
ERNEST BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
