Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JONES v. BALLTYNE et al
as 5:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
BYRON MASON JONES, JR.
Defendant:
LT. BALLTYNE, C.O. BAROFSKI, LT. POLDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sarasota County)
as 8:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Byron A. Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Leavins, Ricky D. Dixon and Ashley Moody
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01029
Petitioner:
James Byron and Byron Lionel Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jones
as 21-10682
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Byron Deon Jones
Jones v. USA
as 1:2020cv00114
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Byron A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
QUIDETTO v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv01618
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BYRON TODD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. QUIDETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Harley v. William Barr
as 19-1632
Defendant / Appellee:
BYRON TODD JONES, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms, and Explosives and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT TIMOTHY HARLEY
Julian Okeayainneh v. DOJ, et al
as 19-30322
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN MARIE ANAYA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BYRON TODD JONES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN OKEAYAINNEH
Okeayainneh v. Justice et al
as 2:2019cv00150
Plaintiff:
Julian Okeayainneh
Defendant:
Byron Todd Jones, Ann Marie Anaya, U S Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallagher v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives et al
as 1:2018cv01693
Defendant:
Regina Lombardo, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Byron Todd Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
