Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Verch v. Curry Chiropractic, P.A.
as 3:2023cv03289
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
Curry Chiropractic, P.A., John C Curry doing business as Curry Chiropractic and Curry Chiropractic, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Curry v. Reyes et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Curry
Defendant:
Ricky J. Reyes, Quaja Goodman, James Montford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Miller v. Daniel Sanchez, et al
as 22-56202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SANCHEZ, Litigation Coordinator, individual, A. PFEIL, Correctional Lieutenant, individual, M. WARMSLEY, Library Technical Assistant, individual and others
Curry v. Axis Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv05337
Plaintiff:
Guy C. Curry
Defendant:
Omni Hotels Management Corporation, Royal O Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Axis Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curry v. JCS Health Care Services et al
as 2:2022cv12752
Plaintiff:
James C. Curry
Defendant:
JCS Health Care Services, JCS Grievance Coordinator, Maxim and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LINDSEY v. CURRY
as 1:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LINDSEY
Defendant:
C. CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Curry
as 3:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
William Lindsey
Defendant:
C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 21-10096
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES C. CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Curry v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01311
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
James C. Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
