Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bias et al v. FSST MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC d/b/a 605 Lending et al
as 1:2026cv10438
Plaintiff:
Morris Bias and Clarence Knox
Defendant:
FSST MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC d/b/a 605 Lending, DUSTIN DERNIER, STEVE CHRISTENSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
BEST-SMITH v. BIA HOMECARE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01654
Defendant:
THOMAS F. BIANCO, BIA HOMECARE SERVICES, LLC, MEGAN BIANCO and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE BEST-SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Bias v. Wescott et al
as 2:2026cv01721
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bias, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Wescott, Randy Lavesphere, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Murzike v. J. Taylor, et al
as 26-12596
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J. TAYLOR, R GREEN, MATTOX and others
Robinson v. Redd et al
as 1:2026cv06115
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Robinson
Defendant:
Trippie Redd, Famous Dex, Travis Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rp Diversity-Real Property
Bias v. Radiology Associates of Richmond, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00692
Plaintiff:
Keisha Bias
Defendant:
Radiology Associates of Richmond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07396
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melton, Logan v. Bias, Jennifer et al
as 3:2026cv00467
Plaintiff:
Logan Michael Melton, Sr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Bias and Bridget Krause
Unknown:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
