Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dickerson v. City of Springfield Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lavar Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Springfield Illinois and Joseph Felchner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zika v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Larimer et al
as 1:2026cv04227
Plaintiff:
Justin Zika
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Larimer County, John Feyen, CorrHealth, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dickerson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv13278
Plaintiff:
Colton Dickerson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TAYLOR v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2026cv00869
Plaintiff:
BERNARD W. TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant:
MS. DICKERSON, SGT. BAILEY, ADMINISTRATORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Huntington National Bank v. W Power Incorporated et al
as 1:2026cv00333
Plaintiff:
The Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
W Power Incorporated and William Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Daniel v. Dickerson et al
as 3:2026cv01091
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel
Defendant:
Sergeant Dickerson, Ms. S, C/O Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Warren Properties, Inc v. Betty Dickerson
as 26-12921
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WARREN PROPERTIES, INC
Defendant:
BETTY DICKERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
