Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Gotschall v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Robert Gotschall
Defendant:
State of Montana, B.O.P.P., PSI Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent:
C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Morgan et al
as 2:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Vencini Smith, L Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. United States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula
as 23-3831
Petitioner:
TRACEY R. GODFREY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA
Not Classified By Court:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, WARDEN, TIMOTHY C. FOX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
SHUMINOFF v. FOX
as 1:2023cv01895
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHUMINOFF
Respondent:
C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fox v. County of Benton
as 4:2023cv05099
Plaintiff:
John C Fox and Christopher Simpson Fox
Defendant:
County of Benton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracey Godfrey v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 23-35398
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRACEY GODFREY
Respondent / Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD, TIMOTHY C. FOX and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
EL v. FOX et al
as 2:2023cv01394
Defendant:
JONATHAN IDEMUDIAN, JONATHAN PHILIP, IDEE C. FOX and others
Plaintiff:
HARUN AL-RASHID EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louis MouratidisIn re: Louis Mouratidis
as 23-1357
Petitioner:
In re: LOUIS MOURATIDIS
Respondent:
KEISHA HUDSON, TOM WOLF, CHIEF JUSTICE AOPC HARRISBURG JUDICIAL EDC DEPT JOHN DOE 1 and others
Yang v. Fox
as 1:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lee Yang
Defendant:
Mary C Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
