Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fox v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
as 1:2026cv26465
Plaintiff:
Debra Fox
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Marcus Satterfield v. Matthan Hicks
as 26-6984
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
MATTHAN HICKS, originally named as Nathan Hicks, LANDON BROWN, LOREN ALDRIGE, originally named as Loren Aldridge and others
James v. Blanco 5B Nashville LLC, et al.
as 3:2026cv01328
Plaintiff:
Tristan James
Defendant:
Blanco 5B Nashville LLC, Blanco Holding Company LLC and Fox Restaurant Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doe v. The Florida Bar et al
as 6:2026cv02084
Defendant:
Interim Chief James Deleu, The Florida Bar, Executive Director Joshua E. Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohammed Saleh v. US
as 26-2267
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED SALEH
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN KATINA HECKARD, CHAPLAIN WEAVER and others
Hilsinger v. Maricopa, City of et al
as 2:2026cv06576
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hilsinger
Defendant:
Maricopa, City of, Unknown Fox and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Strong, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOX v. USA
as 3:2026cv00212
Petitioner:
MARCUS JEROME FOX
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sullivan v. Fox News Network et al
as 2:2026cv00852
Plaintiff:
John Earle Sullivan
Defendant:
Fox News Network LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Fox News Channel, Fox Corporation, Porter Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
FOX v. CITIBANK NA
as 1:2026cv00441
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN FOX
Defendant:
CITIBANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
