Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Easley v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv02112
Plaintiff: William Easley
Defendant: Joseph C Garrett, Karl R Bradford and Darren D Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Garrett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00811
Petitioner: Lawrence C Jones
Respondent: C Garrett
Defendant: Warden Cok
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knipe v. Garrett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff: Joseph Knipe
Defendant: E Kessel and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00653
Petitioner: Lawrence C. Jones
Respondent: C. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mendoza v. Garrett
as 6:2023cv00021
Petitioner: Robert Mendoza, Jr
Respondent: C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Garrett et al
as 2:2023mc03999
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David C. Garrett
Garnishee: CSR Personnel
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant: John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett, III v. LGR Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03660
Plaintiff: Julius C. Garrett, III
Defendant: LGR Trucking, Inc., Edward D. Schrode and J.W. Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Ruttanamongkongul v. Garrett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00851
Petitioner: Thoucharin Ruttanamongkongul
Respondent: C Garrett and Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?