Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Eric Humbert
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 26-6792
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, SOPHIA FEASTER, CHARLIE LOCKLEAR and others
LOCKLEAR et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv08738
Plaintiff:
ROGER LOCKLEAR and THE ESTATE OF VICKI LOCKLEAR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, KENVUE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Locklear v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Zonya Locklear
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
GRAHAM-BEY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2026cv00657
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. GRAHAM-BEY
Defendant:
WENDELL LOCKLEAR, MARY LOCKLEAR, FRED GOINS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ginger Locklear
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Locklear v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
Verdie Elory Locklear
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2026cv01541
Defendant:
Elizabeth Garrett, State of Washington, King County and others
Plaintiff:
Jennafur Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
