Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Garrett et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv04274
Plaintiff:
Joe Garrett, Luther Davis, Gail Price and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LILES v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2026cv01125
Plaintiff:
ALARIUS MONTREAL LILES
Defendant:
MARY LOCKLEAR, P. HARRISON and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
France v. Locklear et al
as 5:2026ct03280
Plaintiff:
William France
Defendant:
C. Locklear, Lt. Oxendine and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Egbert Francis, Jr. v. Mary Locklear
as 26-6931
Petitioner:
EGBERT FRANCIS, JR.
Respondent:
MARY LOCKLEAR
Locklear v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tonya Locklear
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Locklear v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv05886
Plaintiff:
Jessica Locklear
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Paul Locklear, Jr.
as 26-6872
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL LOCKLEAR, JR.
HEATH v. JONES et al
as 1:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS D. HEATH
Defendant:
FONDA ELLISON JONES, JOHN DOE, MARY LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
