Cases 21 - 30 of 409
USA v. Cage
as 23-30618
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher L Cage
Matthews v. Bannua et al
as 1:2023cv07179
Plaintiff:
Nathan Matthews
Defendant:
Cage Bannua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Lillie Cage
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cage Ranch Solar, LLC, et al v. FERC
as 23-1227
Petitioner:
Cage Ranch Solar, LLC and Cage Ranch Solar II, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Cage v. American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv03510
Plaintiff:
Willie Cage
Defendant:
American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Marvin Cage
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
MARSHALL v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19703
Plaintiff:
MARY CAGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alicea v. Cage et al
as 3:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alicea
Defendant:
Cage, Parsns, Sandone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
