Cases 1 - 10 of 77
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. BERGER, et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, COMMON CAUSE, MITZI REYNOLDS TURNER and others
Defendant:
PHILIP BERGER, TIMOTHY MOORE, DESTIN HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971 Voting Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones
Defendant:
commissioner of social security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
MALINDA THOMAS, MS. GROOMS, MICHAEL L. SCARBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Library Officer Ms. Austin and Dietary Officer Sgt. G. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Houser et al
as 3:2022cv00852
Petitioner:
Calvin Jones
Respondent:
Morris Houser and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2021cv01576
Plaintiff:
Jacob Calvin Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Diaz, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv01889
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona, State of and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Calvin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03533
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv05962
Defendant:
WAL-MART, INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., CVS HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JONES and GAYLA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
