Cases 11 - 20 of 25
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Monterrey v. Salomon Cota et al
as 2:2015cv08065
Defendant:
Cypriano Cornelio Aguirre, Feliciana Aguirre, Firmina Aguirre and others
Intervenor:
Save The Valley, LLC
Plaintiff:
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Monterrey
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Imelda Flores et al v. Hugo Diaz
as 2:2014cv05917
Defendant:
Hugo Diaz
Plaintiff:
Imelda Flores, Carlos Robles and Maricela Robles
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014at00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
USA v. Juan Hernandez-Roble
as 13-20503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ-ROBLES, also known as Carlos Robles, also known as Carlos Robles-Hernandez, also known as Juan Carlos Robles-Hernandez, also known as Jean Carlos Robles-Hernandez, also known as Carlos Juan Hernandez Robles, also known as Carlos Robl
Houpt v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv01836
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Carlos Robles and John Doe Officer
Plaintiff:
Edward Houpt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Escamilla-Vargas v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2012cv00087
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Robert L. Harris and others
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Escamilla-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Robles v. Garvey et al
as 4:2011cv00668
Petitioner:
Carlos Robles
Respondent:
Michael D Garvey and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robles v. Casey et al
as 1:2010cv02663
Plaintiff:
Carlos Robles
Defendant:
J.J. Casey , Gary Davis , Kevin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
